jasmineskie | mean-spirited gifts

Current Mood: concerned

mean-spirited gifts

metamaura had a marvelous idea. She started a community --

no_nasty_vgifts -- solely for the purpose of petitioning LJ to no longer make nasty vgifts an option. Go here to sign the petition.

What's the big deal about getting a black rose or a broken heart (or a lump of coal or pile of doggy poo) as a vgift? I personally think a black rose is kinda cool and just as pretty as a red or yellow rose, but imagine -- if you're already down in the dumps and some anonymous moron sends you a black rose with a hurtful message, well, you might not think it was so cool. You might wonder who out there, a person who presumably reads your journal on more than just an occasional basis, hates you enough to spend money to send you a nasty message but doesn't have the balls to sign a name to the gift.

I've had three people on my flist be sent these things recently by cruel, anonymous senders. The gifts were meant to hurt. They were meant to make the recipient feel bad, and in a cowardly way since they were sent anonymously. LJ users can block anonymous comments in their journals. LJ doesn't currently have an option (that I know of) to block anonymous gifts. Sure, the gifts can be deleted, but the damage has already been done, hasn't it.

Some people probably think this is much ado about nothing. For them, it probably is. They can look at a mean-spirited gift, laugh about the loser who spent good money to send it, and move on. Some people just have thicker skins than others; what rolls off their backs might depress someone else for days.

Life (and LJ) already offer plenty of ways for us to be cruel and nasty to each other. LJ doesn't need to make it so easy to be cruel anonymously just so they can make a buck.

Threaded | Flat

I've signed it. The stupid anony gifts is another sad indictment on today's society where people are unwilling to accept and acknowledge the responsibility for their actions. The lump of coal probably symbolises the lump of coal that first-footers take to a house in Scotland just after midnight on New Year's Day. They are meant to be the first visitors to the house (they should be tall, dark and handsome) turn up with Whisky and a lump of coal to bring the householder good luck for the new year.

Thank you for this. :)

I'm so out of touch that I hadn't even realized these gifts were available. Thanks to metamaura for the petition and hugs to you for the heads up:)

thank you. yeah, like aflon says, there are possibly traditions behind different things, but people are just .. ugly, sometimes, and it's not necessary to put a whole business behind that.

i'll go sign. can i link here for this?

Thanks for the link! Signed it right away :)

I can't help but wonder why they've chosen those "gifts" in the gift shop to begin with.. :/

Have I ever told you how much I adore your kind spirit? We are in desperate need of kindness and positive actions in this world.

Life (and LJ) already offer plenty of ways for us to be cruel and nasty to each other. Yes they do, don't they? *sigh*

It is a great idea and I signed it as well. When I first saw the lump of coal, it didn't bother me;I got teased as a kid by my parents that if I didn't behave all I would get from Santa was the coal. *snort* Got it once too...as a joke.

THAT is the difference;if you give it to someone that you know would appreciate it as a joke that's fine. There's a fine line between being sarcastically funny and being rude, a very fine line;the giver of the gift needs to know if the person to whom the gift is intended can take it.

BUT those black roses and the heart are just not funny. Black roses on St. Valentine's Day? Very NOT in the spirit of a martyr, now is it?

Most definitely linking the petition.

I actually adore the black rose , as a nice gift ... it hadn't even occured to me that it could be used as something so negative ...

Thank you for pointing this out to me , i'll be sure to sign it.

I didn't think bad about the black rose either, because I think they can be beautiful too. But if people are using them to hurt others, then we better get rid of them.

I signed.
I hope you don't mind that I copied your entry in my LJ.
Maria

I'm almost entirely with you. Except that I got a black rose from Henry Mortensen and it made my YEAR. But then, we're not a conventional couple, having never strictly met.

Ahem.

Hi Jassy! Petition Signed.

I have to say that I did not know that these suspect gifts existed. I feel so sad to think that there should be so much hatred on LJ. I have been told before that I am naive, perhaps I am, because I cannot understand why people want to hurt each other.

Hugs, Susie.

*pouts*

I want a black rose from Henry Mortensen too!

Raz, you're just too good for your own self, y'know???

I got a virtual gift from an anonymous giver once, and it was really sweet and nice. I got chocolates from

shegollum too!

But that's all I got. Really. *pouts some more* Is it wrong to be so desperate?

Don't answer that.

Really.

I'm signing, because I know there are people out there who do things (like spend money, I don't get that but there it is) to hurt other people. The timing they use often sucks raw eggs as well. There's nothing like kicking somebody when they're already down--geez, isn't life cruel enough already?

Why they'd rather leave a nasty anonymous note with a black rose or a broken heart than go get themselves something off the $.99 menu at Wendy's or McD's, I just don't know. Maybe they don't like fries, jumbo drinks, or frosty's.

That's sad to think even a frosty or some really salty french fries can't make them happy, isn't it?

Hey, LJ? How about a virtual Barbie Legolas instead? *shudders, 'cause it's just too much in so many ways....*

I have given v-gifts and things anonymously. It has never crossed my mind to be hurtful with it.
I just believe a true gift expects nothing in return, not even recognition.
Plus, I didn't want to hurt anyone's feelings by buying one a gift and not another.

I did sign the petition.

It's an option I really, really hate to lose, but if it is being used to hurt people then it has to go.

I signed too - I don't understand why people would want to use V-Gifts to be nasty but some of them are so open to being used that way.

I went over and read the petition.

While I think it's a horrible thing that people are using the gifts to send hurtful messages, I'm not going to sign it, because I don't agree with either option presented.

As has been pointed out before... the different gifts mean different things to different people. I know people who would love to get a black rose, but would hate a red or yellow one.

aflon pointed out a cool positive side to the coal.

As for the anonymous thing, well, there are more reasons than hateful ones to send things anonymously. Maybe the sender doesn't want credit, maybe they don't have an LJ... I can go on and on.

Personally, I think that rather than ruin the fun of most people who aren't using the gifts for anything malicious because there are a few bad eggs out there (as I'd be willing to bet that in a circle of friends, if there's a lot of malicious V-gifts, they're all coming from the same source), they should put more control in the hands of people who get the gifts.

I think that rather than eliminate the so-called negative gifts or take away the option to send anonymously, LJ should give its users the option to opt-out of receiving anonymous gifts. If someone has opted-out, then when you select who you're sending the gift to, the option to remain anonymous will be grayed out, just like the option to comment anonymously is grayed out on journals that require you to have an LJ to post.

That way, people who are just having fun can still have fun, and people who don't want to receive anonymous gifts don't have to receive them.

I think I would prefer a third action for the issue: allowing users to opt out from receiving gifts from anon and/or non-friends. It's not just gifts that already look mean-spirited that can be used in such a way. VGifts at the moment are the only way someone is contactable by just about everyone on the net if they wish so without the user being able to hinder them at all.

Sad to say though that I went over to

suggestions and found that the same idea had been brought up a year ago already and had been rejected

I hope this is successful. At least if people have to say who they are it would cut down on the number sent.

I signed it, ça va sans dire, and I still can't understand how someone can do something so cruel..

Threaded | Flat

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject